To have it completely fair at a tourney, in your opinion bullet, would it be better just to cast 1 lead on .35? And which lead should it be?
suppose the 150g is the middle ground and closest to fishing spec.![]()
thats a good idea 150gm perfect
To have it completely fair at a tourney, in your opinion bullet, would it be better just to cast 1 lead on .35? And which lead should it be?
suppose the 150g is the middle ground and closest to fishing spec.![]()
thats a good idea 150gm perfect
Thats because nobody is big and strong enough to get it to go like the smaller ones!Right then the 175g and the 200g are cast on the same diameter line 0.35 so theoretically the bigger lead for instance 200g should travel further due to it being easier to tow the .35 line....?? But by looking at the records its the total opposite, the 175g towing the same diameter (0.35) line travels further..
thats a good idea 150gm perfect
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!yes thats a good idea we all cast 150s,?????? no make it 200grammes to give me a chance LOL![]()
Thats because nobody is big and strong enough to get it to go like the smaller ones!![]()
yes thats a good idea we all cast 150s,?????? no make it 200grammes to give me a chance LOL![]()
it will require less effort from the lead to drag the line along (proportionately less resistance! But not less effort from the caster to get it going!) Same as the effect on the smaller leads!I understand that JB, but with the 200g being cast on equivalent line that is used for the 175g then should it not require less effort to obtain the same distance, less drag an all..
I bet you dont even fel the 200g on the end of that XTR you have m8....![]()
you seem to be very free with your critisism, ignorant people. and your last comment, "close you down sooner than later"smacks at the fact you would prefer to see the section closed any way? i take it being a mod gives you extra privilages allowing you to call people whatever suits you?Well I am pleased to see that the horses are back in the corral and the ropes put away. What a pack of ignorant people you lot are. You don't care who's name you blacken and you still don't care what you say about anything or anyone.
This will be the last time it happens, anything else and this part of the forum will be closed all together.
At least there was one of you that can manage the word sorry without it choking you, that however doesn't matter. Names should not be used on an open forum accusing people of things when you are just guessing, but you all know that already don't you?
No doubt I will be accused of clamping down and allowing No Exaggerated sillyness by the usual suspects, obviously to try to get me to bite lol. As I have told one or two of you before, I don't bite.
Be very careful with your sarcastic comments to this post though as it might just be enough to close you down sooner rather than later, at least then you could all go back and hide in the holes you have been in for the last few months.
Jim.
if it was,nt john, i DONT know who it wasIgnorant........critisism, get real lol. Try this definition of the word ignorant, you will find it in any dictionary.
lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact
So are you telling me I am wrong in which case you knew who it was and just blamed john/r.
I get no extra privilages being a mod and I certainly don't call people whatever suits me.
Jim.
Definition of the word or meaning of being ignorant....
lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact...!!!
Dave thats not how a modern democratic society works!IF its NOT JOHN ROBSON
Who is it
AS untill it is proven not to be him then i will stick with JOHN for my sins
come on BULLET let him of the hook ...
I know who Bullet is and I also know John R...
I can assure you it is not John R.
Also I'm not at liberty to inform you who Bullet is - that is up to him, and he's also entitled to remain anonymous.
But for the record, Bullet is not John R.
Thats a fact.