CLOSURE OF TEESMOUTH LIFEBOAT STATION

  • Thread starter Thread starter TC
  • Start date Start date
This is the letter I\'ve just sent to Messrs Freemantle and Vlasto.

It\'s the same letter I\'ll be posting to Sir Jock Slater.

If you like, you can use any parts of it you want to include in your own e-mails / letters. I\'d rather they recieved a number of e-mails rather than just one containing several signatories.


Dear Mr Freemantle
(cc M. Vlasto)

North East Sea Angling, (NESA), is an internet based angling \"club\" which came into being approximately 10 years ago and now boasts a membership in excess of 1000.
Whilst, as the name suggests, the membership is largely comprised of anglers from the N.E. area, we do have many members from all over the country and a few from overseas, too.

Primarily, the aim of the site is to provide a forum for like minded anglers who not only have a passion for fishing, but who are also concerned about the wider issues affecting our sport, such as conservation and the marine / coastal environment.

Approximately 4 years ago, it was decided that NESA would \"adopt\" the RNLI as its chosen charity and would raise funds through organised events as well as individual donations.

To date, we have held six fund raising competitions and associated \"on-line\" auctions:
Three shore competitions held from South Shields and Whitley Bay, with the proceeds going to the RNLIs central funds and three large boat fishing competitions - the proceeds from which went to N.E. based Lifeboat Stations:

2003: Amble £2,000
2004: Cullercoats £1,200
2005: Sunderland £1,500

Preparations are underway for this years boat competition, which will take place in May and see the proceeds going to another N.E. based station.

As a result, NESA has so far raised over £7000 for the RNLI. of which, almost £5,000 has gone directly to North East based Lifeboat Stations.

It was anticipated that both the shore and the boat competitions would continue as annual events for many years to come and so continue to help provide vital resources for the RNLI, both nationally and on a more local basis.

However, since learning of the decision to close the Teesmouth Station, coupled with the previous downgradings of both the Sunderland and Blyth stations, I am finding it increasingly difficult to justify the continued support from NESA.

What makes your decision to close the Teesmouth Station more unbelievable, is the fact that you are quoted as having rejected the very generous offer made by the Teesport Authority to provide a new berth suitable for an All Weather Lifeboat, at no cost to the RNLI.

In addition, for the RNLI to have used £400,000 of charitable donations to provide new shore facilities at Teesmouth only two years ago and now make a decision to close the very same station, seems to demonstrate that the RNLI have little consideration for the time and effort given by groups like NESA, and the general public in raising funds to support the RNLI.

I appreciate that the newer boats can cover greater distances in shorter times - GREAT......but use them as an addition to existing services to provide even greater cover - don\'t use them as an excuse to deplete the existing cover. It\'s not as if the RNLI can\'t afford to do that - having in excess of £480 million in reserves, according to your 2004 Statement of Accounts.

Michael Vlasto has been quoted as saying that the decision to close the Teesmouth Station was not made on \"financial grounds\", but on \"an over provision of service\" and that, \"there was more lifeboat cover in the Tees Bay area, including two all-weather lifeboats, than other parts of the UK and it had to make the most effective use of resources.\"
If the decision to remove the RNLI cover from Teesmouth wasn\'t made on \"financial\", but \"over provision\" grounds, can we expect to see the RNLI establishing a new station, complete with a new all weather boat in one of these \"other parts of the country\"?

It was the intention that NESA would eventually hold fund raising boat competitions for ALL the N.E. based Lifeboat Stations (and also continue with fund raising for the RNLI nationally, through our shore competitions) this, as you will appreciate, would result in MANY thousands of pounds being raised.

However, we are now faced with the situation whereby a station we raise funds for one year, may well be closed the following year and thus a lack of trust in the way the money we (and others) raise is managed.

I hope you will take my comments onboard and look again at your decision to close the Teesmouth station. I\'m sure that if the station IS closed, it will result in potentially MANY THOUSANDS of pounds NOT being donated to the RNLI.


Tony Cutter
Site Administrator
NESA



[Edited on 18/4/2006 by TC]
 
I thought Hartlepool had been mentioned........never mind - I think they\'ll get the gist of what I\'m saying.

I\'ve amended my letter accordingly - let\'s hope the RNLI \"amend\" their mistake as quickly when it\'s pointed out to them.



[Edited on 17/4/2006 by TC]
 
Just had a look at my e-mails, Jim - not recieved it yet, m8.

Bit early to say for definite if I\'ll be fishing this weekend - would like to hope so ;)
 
E-mails sent and letter posted.
Wonder if I\'ll get a reply from anybody - if & when I do, I\'ll post them on here.
 
Letter from Michael Vlasto 12th April 2006, would have posted sooner but have not been here

I am writing to inform you that, following a two-year review of lifeboat cover in the Tees Bay area, the RNLI\'s Trustees have decided to close Teesmouth Lifeboat Station. You may already have seen media coverage of this issue but I wanted to ensure that, as a valued supporter of the RNLI, all the facts behind this decision were made available to you.

I am sure you understand that difficult decisions of this nature are only ever made for very sound operational reasons. In this case, there is a clear over-provision of lifeboat cover in the area, with two all weather lifeboats only four miles apart (Teesmouth and Hartlepool) and a total of eight modern, effective lifeboats along that 25 mile stretch of coastline.

It is important to realise that 75% of the 108 services carried out by Teesmouth all weather lifeboat since 2000 could have been safely undertaken by the Hartlepool and Redcar inshore lifeboats. The remaining services (no more than five or six annually) could have been covered by the new Hartlepool all weather lifeboat. In addition the lifeboats at Staithes & Runswick and Whitby can be deployed to Tees Bay if required.

As a supporter of the RNLI, you will appreciate that we have a duty to make the best use of our voluntary donations. This means we must run our lifeboat service as efficiently as possible and can not continue to maintain lifeboats where there is no clear operational need.

The pattern of lifeboat cover on the North East coast dates back to a time when RNLI lifeboats were only capable of eight knots and every small port had a fishing fleet. Today\'s all weather lifeboats are far more powerful than their predecessors, offer more protection to their volunteer crews and have a top speed of 25 knots. Also, the demands on our lifeboat service have changed greatly in recent years, with more than two-thirds of rescues now being carried out by our inshore lifeboats.

Tees Bay is served by one of the highest concentrations of lifeboats anywhere on the 11,072 mile coastline of mainland Great Britain. Therefore despite the withdrawal of one all weather lifeboat from Tees Bay, the RNLI is confident that the remaining seven lifeboats and their volunteer crews will still be well able to meet the RNLI\'s `performance standards\'- that is, to reach at least 90 per cent of all casualties within 10 nautical miles of its lifeboat stations within 30 minutes of launch, in all weathers.


Throughout our long history, the RNLI has provided a life saving service to meet the demands of sea users and reconfiguring lifeboat cover in this way is not a new phenomenon. We have always adjusted lifeboat cover around the coast to keep pace with the type and level of rescues taking place and advances in technology - we must continue to do this. However, please be reassured that we would never withdraw a lifeboat if there was a strong operational reason for maintaining it. The RNLI exists to save lives at sea and this will always be the driving force behind any decisions relating to lifeboat cover.

Teesmouth lifeboat station has a long and distinguished tradition, however this is a sad but necessary step if the RNLI is to continue to respond to the changing needs of all sea-users and thereby continue to meet its charitable objectives. Nevertheless we recognise that this closure will arouse strong feelings, particularly among Teesmouth\'s committed crew and many loyal supporters, all of whom the Institution thanks whole-heartedly for all they have done to save lives at sea, but it is the right decision and we very much hope that they will remain involved with the RNLI and indeed are encouraging them to become involved with other local lifeboat stations.

I hope this letter has helped explain the rationale behind the Trustees\' decision but if you have any concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address overleaf.

Finally, may I take this opportunity to thank you for your continued support of the RNLI, without which our volunteer crews would not have the boats, equipment and training they need to carry out their life-saving task.


Yours sincerely
Michael Vlasto
Operations Director





[Edited on 18/4/2006 by Charlton]
 
Thanks for that, Alan.

What\'s the betting that if I do recieve a reply to my letter, it will be the same letter you\'ve just posted - the \"official line\".

Interesting to read the bit which says, \"As a supporter of the RNLI, you will appreciate that we have a duty to make the best use of our voluntary donations.\"
Does that \"duty\" include the squandering of £400,000 of those \"voluntary donations\" on building a complete new All Weather facility, 2 years prior to closing it down, I wonder?
 
Staithes & Runswick which is located at Staithes? Take it they have got rid of the Runswick inshore boat then? Sure I saw them last year launching from Runswick.

All this talk of getting boats in from other areas is fine as long as there\'s not a big sea running and nobody needs towing. Got a very bad feeling that it\'ll take a disaster to make them see sense! :casstet:
 
\".......it\'ll take a disaster to make them see sense!\"

Yep......that\'s the way it usually works in these sort of things, Mike !
 
Has the person who made the decision to overprovide by £400 000 and wasted valuable RNLI resources still in a job? If the area is so well covered by lifeboats why did they build another station two years ago?

I think with nearly half a billion in reserve and the interest accumalated every year, the RNLI could make huge savings by sacking their \"overproviding\" proffesionals for incompetence and get some honest, caring volanteers to manage their funds properly, just like the guys who risk their own lives all year round and never ask for a penny! I\'m sure there must be accountancy proffesioals etc. who use the sea for pleasure just as we do. After all, the RNLI is a charity
 
Graham, please feel free to send your comments to:

Mike Vlasto (RNLI Operations Director) [email protected]


Andrew Freemantle (RNLI Chief Executive and Secretary) [email protected]


Sir Jock Slater
Chairman RNLI
RNLI Headquarters
West Quay Road
POOLE
Dorset
BH15 1HZ

I\'m sure they\'d be happy to recieve them and answer your queries (well.....mebbies not \"happy\")
 
Seems that there\'s a MASSIVE show of support for the retention of the Teesmouth station from the local community down there.

This support for the station and the annoyance at the proposed closure could result in a huge drop in public and corporate donations to the RNLI. Based on figures calculated over the past five years, the RNLI are looking at a loss of 3.5 million in donations over the next 10 years, if they carry their closure plans forward.

Lets\' hope that money talks - or rather the possibility of losing it, in this case - and that they think again about their closure proposals.
 
Hopefully yes Tony but it has to be a contiued thing mate.

With a £481 million surplus they can carry on untill the public forget.

Lets start to wonder how many times they have done it before.

Jim.
 
Back
Top