1st off....if the person in question IS still able (like Mark) to view the forums without logging in, I agree - he will be smiling from ear to ear (whether that\'s round his face or over his head, I don\'t know - or care), but if he can\'t then I think this (hopefully) temporary measure will have been worth it.
2ndly......banning an IP address is easy.....BUT...... you\'ll find that most users do not have a static IP address. Each time you go on the \'net you get allocated an IP address - chances of getting the SAME one you\'ve had previously are pretty remote. So banning 1 IP address is futile.
Infact - a couple of years ago, I blocked 1 IP address (or so I thought - turned out I\'d banned several people from the Board inadvertently.......the whole block of IP addresses used by the same ISP ended up being blocked.)
Static IP address tend to be found more in the workplace - where a check on each employess internet activity can be monitored.
3rdly.....yes people can report such unwanted e-mails - they can also just use the \"block sender\" facility in their \'net browser. By preventing access to the forums by un-registered users, I was hoping to be able to eliminate the problem at the source - ie picking up on what registered members have posted.
Lastly.....Such a route (log-ins only), is one I\'ve NEVER wanted NESA to go down because we get a lot of new members who have initially been \"lurkers\" and decided to take the plunge and register. However, there are many sites where un-registered users can view all the sections of the site, EXCEPT the forums - to do so, you HAVE to register.
As I\'ve said.....I anticipate that this current arrangement on NESA will only be temporary. I\'ve discussed this problem with Elton and we are hoping to be upgrading NESA over Christmas.
2ndly......banning an IP address is easy.....BUT...... you\'ll find that most users do not have a static IP address. Each time you go on the \'net you get allocated an IP address - chances of getting the SAME one you\'ve had previously are pretty remote. So banning 1 IP address is futile.
Infact - a couple of years ago, I blocked 1 IP address (or so I thought - turned out I\'d banned several people from the Board inadvertently.......the whole block of IP addresses used by the same ISP ended up being blocked.)
Static IP address tend to be found more in the workplace - where a check on each employess internet activity can be monitored.
3rdly.....yes people can report such unwanted e-mails - they can also just use the \"block sender\" facility in their \'net browser. By preventing access to the forums by un-registered users, I was hoping to be able to eliminate the problem at the source - ie picking up on what registered members have posted.
Lastly.....Such a route (log-ins only), is one I\'ve NEVER wanted NESA to go down because we get a lot of new members who have initially been \"lurkers\" and decided to take the plunge and register. However, there are many sites where un-registered users can view all the sections of the site, EXCEPT the forums - to do so, you HAVE to register.
As I\'ve said.....I anticipate that this current arrangement on NESA will only be temporary. I\'ve discussed this problem with Elton and we are hoping to be upgrading NESA over Christmas.
Comment