coARSE / fluff chucking forum

[TC]

I tried to be diplomatic, but then decided against it (see topic in the Freshwater Fishing forum),

New Years Resolution........\"must be more assertive\".........lol

[Edited on 15/1/2005 by TC]

[alan]

seen it Tony

[bribones]

more assertive

lol pity that didnt work with the fish

[gogs]

totally agree with Ell on this,i have always been a sea angler and always will be,tried fluff chucking and never been so bored in my life,if i wanted to catch tame fish i would have put a pond in my garden and fished for goldfish.been a member of nesa since 1999 and cant see the point of adding these forums now,as Ell says there are plenty fluff chucking sites about,but what he never said was (i bet they dont have a sea angler forum on there board)

[bribones]

fluff chucking ? now where does that term come from ?

id hardly call dead baiting for pike fluff chucking
nor sticking a large lob worm on a hook for perch

[Clare]

But there is a demand for it and in order to please your customers/visitors you must supply it. Simple as that really.

There is enough room on the site to accomodate both and if there should be something that you don\'t like then don\'t read it........

Anyway.....there has been a fluff chucking section to the site in someway shape or form since I joined and although I have no immeadiate interest in it I did have a look when I first joined to see what it was. I don\'t know why people have such an aversion to it....if it is there then so what.

Some people on the board do both and their needs have been catered for....We don\'t need a joke section do we, but we have one.....we don\'t need a trading section, but we have one.

The more we have the more we can offer and the more likely we are to be a successful site and become known for the content as well as the members.....even if we do disagree at times and spit the dummy oot...

That is my honest opinions on the subject and if it is not to anyones liking then I am sorry but we will have to agree to disagree on this occasion

[boblydon]

well said Clare....the top and bottom of it is if its not your thing, DONT LOOK AT IT !!!! there are several sections i never bother with, probally the same as many others.
next we will be wanting to ban tv and radio stations couse we dont like them.....anyway i think president Ell is winding us up, he is probally on his hols having a right laugh

[gag1]

Very well said Clare. Gogs mate - I never read the boat angling section as it just doesnt interest me but I wouldnt complain about it and ask for its removal. Its all down to personal choice and I for one will be a regular reader/poster in the freshwater section. NESA is the best angling site anywhere and I am aware that its a sea angling site but if I can access info on fly fishing on here from members that actually go fly fishing, GREAT !. Its not compusory for anyone to read the freshwater forum mate !

cheers.
george.

[bribones]

9297 members now isnt that a nice number ?
not nesa but another board im a member of http://www.fishforums.net/forums/
this is a tropical fish forum but just look at the amount of other sections that cater for other users i dont keep tropical fish but theres a section that allows me to use the board and have easy access to other parts .i asked a fishing related question here once in the salt water section and got a good response ,the whole persona of nesa should be to expand to include other aspects/topics ,im not apposed to a hunting shooting section either as i know a lot of the lads do a bit ,no good can come of sitting in a rut you have to move with the times