Aye Jim, I realise it IS a case of going over well trodden ground and most people have had their say on the issue, but there\'s been a good number of people joined the site since this was last raised........they now have a chance to voice their opinion, also.
However, to my mind, there IS only 1 view.......the keeping of LEGALLY DEFINED undersized fish is illegal.......NO ARGUMENT.....and that rule applies to ALL anglers fishing within the bounds of the area that the rule applies to.
By the way......incase anybody got the wrong idea........I don\'t drive at 55mph on 30mph roads.........I was only citing that as a similar ridiculous reason for assuming that a set limit didn\'t apply on environmental grounds.........lol
Lol Peter.......I think the word should be \"released\" not \"returned\"
However, to my mind, there IS only 1 view.......the keeping of LEGALLY DEFINED undersized fish is illegal.......NO ARGUMENT.....and that rule applies to ALL anglers fishing within the bounds of the area that the rule applies to.
By the way......incase anybody got the wrong idea........I don\'t drive at 55mph on 30mph roads.........I was only citing that as a similar ridiculous reason for assuming that a set limit didn\'t apply on environmental grounds.........lol
Lol Peter.......I think the word should be \"released\" not \"returned\"
Comment