Monster 49 pound shore fishing Norway, Skarnsundet!!

[KeithB]

It's not really on posting snippets of the report here then linking to another forum for the full report.

[codseeker]

i say get full report on mick stops the bickering in the end

[willywetegg]

Well said Terry, the advertising was one of the problems about this, the "Click Here" for how to book is not normally done. Another thing is, the whole report was posted on here at the beginning and then most of it removed before many people saw it. I saw it and the proof is still there for me to see through his edit too, what would anyone else think about that .

Most people ask if they can mention their site or in this case business and they are told to put a link into their signature, then there are those that don't ask and just put a link in their signature or every post anyway, which I have always found quite rude.

We have no problem with the report being posted, even if it is for the second time lol.

Jim.

[codseeker]

basiclly i think the reason was phil had done a report and later realised that the lads he had over there deserved the glory and let them put it up elsewhere first to not spoil the surprise catches just my opinion tho

[col]

sorry you feel this way mods,but the fact remains,that this trip was organised by bsa anglers and a full report should not have been on any other site before our own,this was the reason phil was asked to edit his original post on here before we had even touched back down in england,
once the full report of the weekend was up on our forum then im sure it would have made its way onto all of the other forums too.the actual pics that were added to your site to begin with were done so by your members,and not by us,and were either took from another site,or blog.

[willywetegg]

You are right about that col, the report should not have been made on here but it was and then it was removed. I haven't a clue where the second two photo's came from but they were all on here originally and the first one was still left on with just the link altered.

As you say the trip was arranged by people from your site and that is the only place the full report should have gone in the beginning. It's certainly not a case of "Feeling like this" as you put it, just that people are asking why it has not been fully reported on here and it is starting to sound that it was blocked or removed by people from this site, that is not the case at all, it was removed by the person that posted it in the first place which can be seen in the first post.

Jim.

[col]

thanks for the reply mate,
the reason it was removed was basically because it was added not only to this forum but to others in error.it was added and then removed before the party who were over there had made it back to the uk,
now whilst phil has every right to add pics onto the forums from his own blog,it was actually a request by us, to remove all of the topics in question untill we could organise a full report of the weeks events.this would then have been placed on all forums as a full report of the trip and not the way it has actually manifested over the last few days.
this would have been far more organised and a full detailed account would have been there for all to see.

now im not sure how many of the nesa memebers want to actually have the full reports placed onto here now that everyone knows more or less what was caught,but it can easily be arranged without the need to click onto any other site including our own.