If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What jealousy? Ive nothing to be jealous about especially salmon and match fishing! I do my own thing fishing and dont follow the sheep! Ps next time your in a urinal watch ur shoes i might p*ss on them! end!
So if it wasn't jealousy....What was it ? Why the cheap shot at other anglers ?
Remember, if you want the right to follow your path, you must allow the same right, to all and alike !
Don't think you will ever get to pee on my shoes, I pee on the grass with the rest of the flock !
Makes me laugh all these posts on save our coastline save our rivers, the only thing our government cares about is save ourselves and save our wealth, what are the angling voices going to say when Dr Einstein shows details diagrams with proven maths on the effect it will have on the fish species, and what effect the new way of getting energy will do to the world???! Excuse me mate we fish here and kill these fish we are trying to protect, for sport and financial gain, but we let them breed so there is more for us to kill, give your head a shake and get off your soap box no hobby will ever get in the way of energy sourcing projects.
So you propose doing nothing ?....Now that is laughable !
There are a whole heap of 'Dr Frankensteins' working positively on the maths, the graphs, the diagrams....size limits, quotas, etc? Far from perfect, but a start down a long road ?
We won't be breeding/ killing / catching anything, be it for sport, or gain, if they aren't there in the first place ?
All I am saying is that Angling should make it's point known in any discussions from the start, even if it is only make them pay lip service, and appear to play fair ?
What is your alternative...?
With regards to 'Shaking my head, and Soap Boxes', maybe you should 'Rattle your own Bonce a bit', and Goggle ..'Forum ?'.
i don't think any one has looked at the bigger picture here, if you can produce a clean efficient way of producing electricity without any pollution of the atmosphere,land or the seas on our planet it must benifit all life that live here . this is a excellant form of constant renewable energy that in theory could last for ever. i know that there will always be issues concerning the building and running of a large project like this and the aquatic life forms that live there will be disrupted but this is 2015 not 1915 and goverments are only too aware of what major enviromental disasters wil cost them in cash and more importantly votes so i am sure they will do everthing in their power to minimise any eviromental disruption. put it this way you have a super tanker steaming up the english channel carrying 100000 tons of crude oil to burn and it goes aground [and they do ] spilling the lot into the open sea now that really is an aquatic disaster on a massive scale
i don't think any one has looked at the bigger picture here, if you can produce a clean efficient way of producing electricity without any pollution of the atmosphere,land or the seas on our planet it must benifit all life that live here . this is a excellant form of constant renewable energy that in theory could last for ever. i know that there will always be issues concerning the building and running of a large project like this and the aquatic life forms that live there will be disrupted but this is 2015 not 1915 and goverments are only too aware of what major enviromental disasters wil cost them in cash and more importantly votes so i am sure they will do everthing in their power to minimise any eviromental disruption. put it this way you have a super tanker steaming up the english channel carrying 100000 tons of crude oil to burn and it goes aground [and they do ] spilling the lot into the open sea now that really is an aquatic disaster on a massive scale
It seems to me, that the push towards sustainable energy is primarily driven by a desire to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, in order to protect the environment from climate change. Is it not paradoxical, that the proposed solution is in itself, likely to be very damaging to the environment.
It seems to me, that the push towards sustainable energy is primarily driven by a desire to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, in order to protect the environment from climate change. Is it not paradoxical, that the proposed solution is in itself, likely to be very damaging to the environment.
i agree, but without an atmophere there is no life and with the wrong type of atmosphere life struggles,even when it is only slightly out of kilter, the coral reefs wich have the greatest diversity of marine life in the world are dying becouse the ocean tempretures have risen only a few degrees.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment