Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tidal Power Lagoons

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by flatrock View Post
    What jealousy? Ive nothing to be jealous about especially salmon and match fishing! I do my own thing fishing and dont follow the sheep! Ps next time your in a urinal watch ur shoes i might p*ss on them! end!
    So if it wasn't jealousy....What was it ? Why the cheap shot at other anglers ?
    Remember, if you want the right to follow your path, you must allow the same right, to all and alike !

    Don't think you will ever get to pee on my shoes, I pee on the grass with the rest of the flock !

    M.....

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Philthebag View Post
      Makes me laugh all these posts on save our coastline save our rivers, the only thing our government cares about is save ourselves and save our wealth, what are the angling voices going to say when Dr Einstein shows details diagrams with proven maths on the effect it will have on the fish species, and what effect the new way of getting energy will do to the world???! Excuse me mate we fish here and kill these fish we are trying to protect, for sport and financial gain, but we let them breed so there is more for us to kill, give your head a shake and get off your soap box no hobby will ever get in the way of energy sourcing projects.
      So you propose doing nothing ?....Now that is laughable !
      There are a whole heap of 'Dr Frankensteins' working positively on the maths, the graphs, the diagrams....size limits, quotas, etc? Far from perfect, but a start down a long road ?
      We won't be breeding/ killing / catching anything, be it for sport, or gain, if they aren't there in the first place ?

      All I am saying is that Angling should make it's point known in any discussions from the start, even if it is only make them pay lip service, and appear to play fair ?
      What is your alternative...?

      With regards to 'Shaking my head, and Soap Boxes', maybe you should 'Rattle your own Bonce a bit', and Goggle ..'Forum ?'.

      M.....

      Comment


      • #18
        just had the same email

        Comment


        • #19
          i don't think any one has looked at the bigger picture here, if you can produce a clean efficient way of producing electricity without any pollution of the atmosphere,land or the seas on our planet it must benifit all life that live here . this is a excellant form of constant renewable energy that in theory could last for ever. i know that there will always be issues concerning the building and running of a large project like this and the aquatic life forms that live there will be disrupted but this is 2015 not 1915 and goverments are only too aware of what major enviromental disasters wil cost them in cash and more importantly votes so i am sure they will do everthing in their power to minimise any eviromental disruption. put it this way you have a super tanker steaming up the english channel carrying 100000 tons of crude oil to burn and it goes aground [and they do ] spilling the lot into the open sea now that really is an aquatic disaster on a massive scale

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by paulthespark View Post
            i don't think any one has looked at the bigger picture here, if you can produce a clean efficient way of producing electricity without any pollution of the atmosphere,land or the seas on our planet it must benifit all life that live here . this is a excellant form of constant renewable energy that in theory could last for ever. i know that there will always be issues concerning the building and running of a large project like this and the aquatic life forms that live there will be disrupted but this is 2015 not 1915 and goverments are only too aware of what major enviromental disasters wil cost them in cash and more importantly votes so i am sure they will do everthing in their power to minimise any eviromental disruption. put it this way you have a super tanker steaming up the english channel carrying 100000 tons of crude oil to burn and it goes aground [and they do ] spilling the lot into the open sea now that really is an aquatic disaster on a massive scale
            It seems to me, that the push towards sustainable energy is primarily driven by a desire to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, in order to protect the environment from climate change. Is it not paradoxical, that the proposed solution is in itself, likely to be very damaging to the environment.

            After all, what is it that are we trying to save?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Beaky View Post
              It seems to me, that the push towards sustainable energy is primarily driven by a desire to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, in order to protect the environment from climate change. Is it not paradoxical, that the proposed solution is in itself, likely to be very damaging to the environment.

              After all, what is it that are we trying to save?
              our planet

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by paulthespark View Post
                our planet
                Or what is left of it...

                There is so much more to the planet and our environment than the content of the atmosphere.

                Comment


                • #23
                  i agree, but without an atmophere there is no life and with the wrong type of atmosphere life struggles,even when it is only slightly out of kilter, the coral reefs wich have the greatest diversity of marine life in the world are dying becouse the ocean tempretures have risen only a few degrees.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X