Well, from the script it would appear that the alleged \"double figure Cod\" (although we have no proof even of that) was weighed minus the mythical pirk, however there is no positive means to show, and dare i add a serious indication in the negative by lack of inferrence, that the other fish caught were in fact weighd as \"pirked\", is this the way forward?, should we inform the likes of Sea Angler etc that in future all fish weights are to be \"as pirked\" ? .................
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TONYS FISH
Collapse
X
-
]` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` )
. . ,,,,,,___[ ~ \___
,,;;`` [_________/-,......... Norman......... http://slinkykate.com/
-
As my Honourable Friend, the Member for Cramlington, is fully aware, irrefutable proof that no WMD were employed, is impossible to provide (as would, indeed, be the case for any other member finding him/herself in a similar, unusual situation (ie catching fish).
To conclude from the Member for Nottinghams’ omission to state that no WMD were employed (neither covertly or otherwise) in the capture of the other fish, that such WMD were involved, is inaccurate and misleading.
Comment
-
so ........... does that mean that you ALWAYS weigh in the pirk. don`t be misguided, if that is the way forward then we will all adjust our scales to suit .... no poblem
]` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` )
. . ,,,,,,___[ ~ \___
,,;;`` [_________/-,......... Norman......... http://slinkykate.com/
Comment
-
Lol....I was trying to make my replies as boring as possible, (whilst maintaining a bit of humour), in the hope it would make peeps fed up with this. But, ho-hum.......looks like it\'s still gonna keep rolling along for another 8 MONTHS
Jim....
New avatar......I think most peeps avatars could do with updating - some have had the same for years, just thought I\'d update mine. That\'s one of the perks (OH NO! here we go again), of having access to the admin centre
[Edited on 25/3/2004 by TC]
Comment
Comment